What are Green Bonds and Why Should You Care?

Green Bonds

Green bonds are a type of fixed-income instrument that is specifically earmarked to raise money for climate and environmental projects. These bonds are typically asset-linked and backed by the issuing entity’s balance sheet, so they usually carry the same credit rating as their issuers’ other debt obligations. Green bonds are sometimes referred to as climate bonds, but the two terms are not always synonymous. Climate bonds specifically finance projects that reduce carbon emissions or alleviate the effects of climate change, while green bonds represent a broader category of instruments related to projects with a positive environmental impact.

Green bonds differ from conventional bonds in that they have an explicit environmental purpose and are subject to additional disclosure and verification requirements. To qualify for green bond status, they are often verified by a third party such as the Climate Bond Standard Board, which certifies that the bond will fund projects that include benefits to the environment. Green bonds may also come with tax incentives such as tax exemption and tax credits, making them a more attractive investment vs. a comparable taxable bond. These tax advantages provide a monetary incentive to tackle prominent social issues such as climate change and a movement toward renewable sources of energy.

Green bonds are important for sustainable finance because they can mobilize capital from investors who are interested in environmental and social goals, as well as financial returns. Green bonds can also help diversify the sources and instruments of financing for green projects and increase the transparency and accountability of environmental spending. Green bonds are part of a larger trend in socially responsible and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, which aims to incorporate non-financial factors into investment decisions.

The green bond market has grown rapidly in recent years, reflecting the increasing awareness and demand for green finance. According to the Climate Bonds Initiative, the global green bond issuance reached a record high of $269.5 billion in 2020, up by 26% from 2019. The cumulative green bond issuance since 2007 amounted to $1.04 trillion by the end of 2020. The main issuers of green bonds are governments, corporations, and financial institutions, while the main buyers are institutional investors, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and asset managers. The main sectors that benefit from green bond financing are renewable energy, low-carbon transport, sustainable buildings, and water management.

Benefits of Issuing and Investing in Green Bonds

Green bonds are a type of fixed-income instrument that is specifically earmarked to raise money for climate and environmental projects. They have several benefits for both issuers and investors, as well as for the planet. Here are some of the benefits of issuing and investing in green bonds in more detail:

• Issuing green bonds can help raise funds for green projects at a lower cost, as green bonds may offer tax incentives or subsidies to attract investors. For example, in some countries, such as the US, France, and India, green bonds are exempt from certain taxes or enjoy lower tax rates than conventional bonds. This can reduce the borrowing cost and increase the net proceeds for the issuers.
• Issuing green bonds can enhance the reputation and credibility of the issuer, as green bonds demonstrate the issuer’s commitment to environmental and social goals and attract positive publicity and recognition. For example, some issuers, such as Apple, Starbucks, and Toyota, have received awards or accolades for their green bond issuances. This can improve the issuer’s brand value and customer loyalty, as well as its relations with regulators and stakeholders.
• Issuing green bonds can attract new and loyal investors, as green bonds appeal to a growing segment of investors who are interested in environmental and social issues, as well as financial returns. For example, some investors, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and asset managers, have specific mandates or preferences for green or sustainable investments. This can increase the demand and liquidity for the issuer’s bonds and reduce the risk premium and volatility.
• Investing in green bonds can diversify the portfolio, as green bonds offer exposure to a variety of sectors and projects that are related to environmental and climate issues, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, green buildings, and clean transportation. For example, some green bonds are issued by entities that are not typically present in the conventional bond market, such as municipalities, utilities, and development banks. This can reduce the correlation and increase the diversification of the investor’s portfolio and enhance the risk-return profile.
• Investing in green bonds can reduce the exposure to environmental risks, as green bonds finance projects that mitigate or adapt to the effects of climate change and environmental degradation, such as carbon emissions, pollution, and natural disasters. For example, some green bonds are linked to the performance or outcome of the underlying projects, such as the amount of greenhouse gas emissions avoided, or the energy saved. This can protect the investor’s investment from the potential losses or damages caused by environmental risks and increase the resilience and sustainability of the portfolio.
• Investing in green bonds can generate positive social and environmental impacts, as green bonds contribute to the financing of projects that have beneficial effects on the environment and society, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving air and water quality, and creating green jobs. For example, some green bonds provide regular reporting and disclosure on the use and impact of the proceeds, such as the environmental and social indicators and metrics. This can enable the investor to measure and monitor the impact of their investment and align their investment with their values and objectives.

Challenges of Issuing and Investing in Green Bonds

Green bonds are bonds that are issued to finance projects that have positive environmental impacts, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency, or promoting renewable energy. Green bonds have become a popular and fast-growing segment of the bond market, as they offer benefits for both issuers and investors, as well as for the planet. However, green bonds also face some challenges and risks that may limit their potential and effectiveness. Some of the challenges of issuing and investing in green bonds are:

• Lack of standardization and regulation: There is no universally accepted definition, criteria, or label for what constitutes a green bond, which may create confusion and inconsistency among issuers, investors, and verifiers. There is also no mandatory or comprehensive regulation or supervision of the green bond market, which may expose it to fraud, misrepresentation, or greenwashing. Greenwashing is the practice of making false or exaggerated claims about the environmental benefits of a product or service, in order to attract customers or investors. For example, some issuers may use green bonds to finance projects that are not truly green, or that have negative social or environmental impacts, such as fossil fuel projects, nuclear power plants, or large dams.
• Higher transaction costs and complexity: Issuing green bonds may entail higher transaction costs and complexity than issuing conventional bonds, as green bonds require additional steps and processes, such as verification, certification, and reporting. Verification is the process of checking and confirming that the green bond proceeds are used for eligible green projects, and that the projects meet the relevant standards and criteria. Certification is the process of obtaining a formal recognition or endorsement from a reputable third party, such as the Climate Bonds Initiative, that the green bond complies with certain principles and guidelines. Reporting is the process of disclosing and communicating the use and impact of the green bond proceeds to the investors and the public, such as the environmental and social indicators and metrics. These steps and processes may increase the time, effort, and resources needed to issue green bonds, and may require more coordination and communication among different stakeholders, such as issuers, investors, verifiers, certifiers, and regulators.
• Limited availability and liquidity: The green bond market is still relatively small and niche compared to the conventional bond market, which may limit the availability and liquidity of green bonds. Availability refers to the quantity and diversity of green bonds that are issued and offered to the investors, while liquidity refers to the ease and speed of buying and selling green bonds in the secondary market. The limited availability and liquidity of green bonds may reduce the attractiveness and accessibility of green bonds for some investors, especially those who have large or specific investment needs or preferences, or those who value flexibility and convenience. The limited availability and liquidity of green bonds may also affect the pricing and valuation of green bonds, as they may create a supply-demand imbalance or a market inefficiency.
• Low yields and returns: Green bonds may offer lower yields and returns than conventional bonds, as green bonds may have lower risks, higher demand, or lower costs than conventional bonds. For example, green bonds may have lower credit risk, as green projects may be more resilient and profitable than non-green projects, or as green issuers may have stronger financial performance and reputation than non-green issuers. Green bonds may also have higher demand, as green bonds may appeal to a growing segment of investors who are interested in environmental and social issues, as well as financial returns. Green bonds may also have lower costs, as green bonds may benefit from tax incentives or subsidies that reduce the borrowing cost or increase the net proceeds for the issuers. The low yields and returns of green bonds may deter some investors, especially those who have higher risk appetite or return expectations, or those who face higher opportunity costs or trade-offs.

Criteria and Standards for Defining and Verifying Green Bonds

There is no universally accepted definition or label for green bonds, but there are several voluntary frameworks and guidelines that provide recommendations and best practices for issuing and investing in green bonds. 

One of the most widely used frameworks is the Green Bond Principles (GBP), which are published by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and endorsed by over 300 members, including issuers, investors, banks, and rating agencies. The GBP recommend four core components for green bonds: 

• Use of proceeds, which should be allocated to eligible green projects that have clear environmental benefits.
• Process for project evaluation and selection, which should be transparent and aligned with the issuer’s environmental objectives and strategy.
• Management of proceeds, which should be tracked and reported separately from other funds.
• Reporting, which should provide information on the use and impact of the proceeds, preferably using quantitative and qualitative indicators.

 The GBP also provide high-level categories for eligible green projects, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, green buildings, and clean transportation, and refer to other sources that provide more detailed definitions, standards, and taxonomies for determining the environmental sustainability of projects. In addition to the GBP, there are other frameworks and guidelines that complement or supplement the GBP, such as the Climate Bond Standard (CBS), which focuses on projects that contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation; the Social Bond Principles (SBP), which focus on projects that have positive social outcomes; the Sustainability Bond Guidelines (SBG), which cover bonds that finance both green and social projects; and the Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles (SLBP), which link the bond’s financial and/or structural characteristics to the issuer’s sustainability performance.

Role of different actors and institutions

There are various actors and institutions involved in the green bond ecosystem, each with their own roles and responsibilities. Some of the main actors and institutions are:

• Issuers: Issuers are the entities that issue green bonds to raise funds for green projects. They can be public or private, such as governments, corporations, or financial institutions. Issuers are responsible for complying with the relevant frameworks and guidelines, such as the GBP, and for providing transparent and credible information on the use and impact of the proceeds. Issuers may also seek external verification or certification from third parties to enhance the credibility and attractiveness of their green bonds.
• Investors: Investors are the entities that buy green bonds to invest in green projects. They can be institutional or individual, such as pension funds, insurance companies, asset managers, or retail investors. Investors are responsible for conducting due diligence and analysis on the green bonds they invest in, and for monitoring and evaluating the performance and impact of their investments. Investors may also use ratings or indices to assess the quality and risk of green bonds, and to compare them with other investment options.
• Rating agencies: Rating agencies are the entities that provide ratings or opinions on the creditworthiness and environmental quality of green bonds. They can be traditional or specialized, such as Moody’s, S&P, or CBI. Rating agencies are responsible for applying consistent and rigorous methodologies and criteria to evaluate and compare green bonds, and for providing independent and objective information to the market. Rating agencies may also provide guidance or recommendations on how to improve the quality and transparency of green bonds.
• Certifiers: Certifiers are the entities that provide certification or assurance on the compliance and alignment of green bonds with certain frameworks or standards, such as the CBS. They can be non-profit or for-profit, such as CBI, Vigeo Eiris, or Sustainalytics. Certifiers are responsible for verifying and validating the use and impact of the proceeds, and for issuing certificates or labels that indicate the conformity of green bonds with the relevant frameworks or standards. Certifiers may also provide feedback or suggestions on how to enhance the environmental benefits and integrity of green bonds.
• Regulators: Regulators are the entities that provide regulation or supervision of the green bond market, such as central banks, securities commissions, or stock exchanges. They can be national or regional, such as the European Commission, the People’s Bank of China, or the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Regulators are responsible for establishing and enforcing rules and requirements for issuing and investing in green bonds, such as definitions, criteria, disclosure, and reporting. Regulators may also provide incentives or support for the development and growth of the green bond market, such as tax benefits, subsidies, or guarantees.

Reason behind issuance of Green Bonds

Green bonds are bonds that are issued to finance projects that have positive environmental impacts, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency, or promoting renewable energy. According to the Green Bond Principles (GBP), which are voluntary guidelines for green bond issuers and investors, there are ten broad categories of eligible green projects and sectors that can be financed by green bonds. These are:

• Renewable energy: This includes the production, transmission, distribution, and storage of energy from renewable sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, biomass, and biofuels. Examples of green bonds that finance renewable energy projects are the ones issued by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to support solar power plants in India, and by the European Investment Bank (EIB) to support wind farms in Brazil.
• Energy efficiency: This includes the reduction of energy consumption or losses, or the improvement of energy performance, in various sectors, such as buildings, industry, transport, and agriculture. Examples of green bonds that finance energy efficiency projects are the ones issued by the World Bank to support energy-efficient lighting and appliances in Mexico, and by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to support energy-efficient buildings and district heating in China.
• Green buildings: This includes the construction, renovation, operation, or acquisition of buildings that meet certain standards or certifications for environmental performance, such as energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste management, or indoor environmental quality. Examples of green bonds that finance green buildings are the ones issued by the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) to support green commercial buildings in China, and by the City of Paris to support social housing and public buildings in France.
• Low-carbon transport: This includes the development, operation, or maintenance of low-carbon or zero-emission modes of transport, such as public transport, electric vehicles, cycling, or walking. Examples of green bonds that finance low-carbon transport are the ones issued by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to support metro systems in Turkey, and by the Transport for London (TfL) to support electric buses and trains in the UK.
• Waste management: This includes the prevention, reduction, reuse, recycling, recovery, or disposal of waste, as well as the production of energy or materials from waste. Examples of green bonds that finance waste management are the ones issued by the Nordic Investment Bank (NIB) to support waste-to-energy plants in Finland, and by the Republic of Indonesia to support waste-to-energy projects in Indonesia.
• Water management: This includes the protection, conservation, management, or restoration of water resources, as well as the provision of water supply, sanitation, or irrigation services. Examples of green bonds that finance water management are the ones issued by the African Development Bank (AfDB) to support water supply and sanitation projects in Africa, and by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) to support water infrastructure projects in the US.
• Climate adaptation: This includes the enhancement of the resilience or adaptation of human or natural systems to the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather events, sea level rise, or biodiversity loss. Examples of green bonds that finance climate adaptation are the ones issued by the European Union (EU) to support climate resilience projects in Europe, and by the Republic of Seychelles to support marine conservation and climate adaptation projects in Seychelles.
• Biodiversity and ecosystems: This includes the protection, conservation, restoration, or sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems, such as forests, wetlands, oceans, or wildlife. Examples of green bonds that finance biodiversity and ecosystems are the ones issued by the World Bank to support forest conservation and restoration projects in Brazil, and by the Republic of Chile to support marine protected areas and sustainable fisheries in Chile.
• Pollution prevention and control: This includes the prevention, reduction, or remediation of pollution or contamination of air, water, soil, or noise, as well as the production or use of environmentally friendly products or technologies. Examples of green bonds that finance pollution prevention and control are the ones issued by the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to support air quality improvement projects in China, and by the Republic of Poland to support low-emission agriculture and circular economy projects in Poland.
• Circular economy: This includes the promotion of a circular economy that minimizes the use of resources and maximizes their value and lifespan, through the design, production, consumption, and recovery of goods and services. Examples of green bonds that finance circular economy are the ones issued by the European Investment Fund (EIF) to support circular economy projects in Europe, and by the ABN AMRO Bank to support circular economy businesses in the Netherlands.

These are some of the types and examples of green projects and sectors that are financed by green bonds, which aim to contribute to the transition to a low-carbon and green economy. Green bonds are an important instrument for mobilizing capital from investors who are interested in environmental and social goals, as well as financial returns. Green bonds are also part of a larger trend in sustainable finance, which seeks to incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into financial decisions and practices.

Performance and Impact of Green Bonds

The performance and impact of green bonds can be evaluated from both financial and environmental perspectives, and they are measured and reported by issuers and third parties using various methods and indicators.

From a financial perspective, the performance of green bonds can be assessed by comparing their returns, risks, and costs with those of conventional bonds. According to some studies, green bonds tend to have similar or slightly higher returns, lower risks, and lower costs than conventional bonds, which may reflect the growing demand, lower credit risk, and tax incentives of green bonds12. However, the financial performance of green bonds may also depend on other factors, such as the issuer’s credit rating, the bond’s maturity, the currency, the market conditions, and the investor’s preferences3.

From an environmental perspective, the impact of green bonds can be measured by estimating the environmental benefits and outcomes of the projects financed by green bonds, such as the amount of greenhouse gas emissions avoided, the energy saved, or the water conserved. These environmental indicators can be calculated using various methods, such as lifecycle analysis, counterfactual analysis, or project-specific metrics4. However, the environmental impact of green bonds may also depend on other factors, such as the additionality, the baseline, the leakage, and the rebound effects of the projects.

The measurement and reporting of the performance and impact of green bonds are important for enhancing the transparency and credibility of the green bond market, and for providing information and feedback to the issuers, investors, and regulators. The issuers of green bonds are responsible for disclosing and communicating the use and impact of the proceeds, preferably using quantitative and qualitative indicators, and following the relevant frameworks and guidelines, such as the Green Bond Principles (GBP) or the Climate Bond Standard (CBS). The third parties, such as rating agencies, certifiers, or verifiers, are responsible for providing independent and objective assessments and validations of the compliance and alignment of green bonds with certain standards and criteria, and for issuing ratings, certificates, or labels that indicate the quality and risk of green bonds.

Challenges and issues in Developing and Emerging Markets

Green bonds have become a popular and fast-growing segment of the bond market, as they offer benefits for both issuers and investors, as well as for the planet. However, the green bond market also faces some opportunities and challenges, especially in developing countries and emerging markets, where the demand and potential for green finance are high, but the supply and capacity are low. Some of the opportunities and challenges for expanding the green bond market in these regions are:

Opportunities: Developing countries and emerging markets have a large and urgent need for green finance, as they face the dual challenge of achieving economic development and addressing environmental and social issues, such as climate change, pollution, and poverty. Green bonds can provide a source of long-term and low-cost financing for green projects that can enhance the resilience and sustainability of these countries, as well as their alignment with the global climate goals and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Green bonds can also help diversify the investor base and attract international capital flows for these countries, as they appeal to a growing segment of investors who are interested in environmental and social impacts, as well as financial returns. Moreover, green bonds can create positive spillovers and synergies for the development of the local capital markets and the green economy, as they can foster innovation, transparency, and regulation in the financial sector, and stimulate the demand and supply of green goods and services in the real sector.

Challenges: Developing countries and emerging markets also face some barriers and constraints for issuing and investing in green bonds, such as the lack of awareness, expertise, and infrastructure for green finance; the high transaction costs and complexity of green bond issuance and verification; the low availability and liquidity of green bonds in the local markets; the low yields and returns of green bonds compared to other investment options; and the risk of greenwashing or misrepresentation of environmental claims. These challenges may limit the attractiveness and accessibility of green bonds for both issuers and investors, and hinder the growth and quality of the green bond market in these regions.

To address these opportunities and challenges, some potential solutions and innovations have been proposed and implemented, such as:

Blended finance: Blended finance is the use of concessional or public funds to leverage or catalyze private or commercial funds for green projects, by reducing the risks, costs, or barriers for the private sector. Blended finance can take various forms, such as guarantees, subsidies, grants, or equity, and can be provided by various actors, such as multilateral development banks, development finance institutions, or governments. Blended finance can help overcome some of the challenges of green bond issuance and investment, such as the high transaction costs, the low credit ratings, or the low returns, and can help mobilize more capital and scale up the green bond market in developing countries and emerging markets.

Green bond funds: Green bond funds are collective investment schemes that invest primarily or exclusively in green bonds, and provide investors with diversified exposure and access to the green bond market. Green bond funds can be managed by various entities, such as asset managers, banks, or development finance institutions, and can target various investors, such as institutional or retail investors. Green bond funds can help overcome some of the challenges of green bond investment, such as the low availability and liquidity, the low yields and returns, or the lack of information and analysis, and can help increase the demand and liquidity of the green bond market in developing countries and emerging markets.

Green bond indices: Green bond indices are benchmarks or indicators that track the performance and characteristics of a basket or portfolio of green bonds, and provide investors with information and guidance on the green bond market. Green bond indices can be created and maintained by various entities, such as rating agencies, index providers, or stock exchanges, and can cover various segments, such as global or regional, corporate or sovereign, or labeled or unlabeled green bonds. Green bond indices can help overcome some of the challenges of green bond investment, such as the lack of standardization and regulation, the lack of transparency and disclosure, or the lack of comparison and evaluation, and can help improve the quality and integrity of the green bond market in developing countries and emerging markets.

Conclusion

Green bonds are bonds that are issued to finance projects that have positive environmental impacts, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency, or promoting renewable energy. Green bonds have significant potential for advancing the global climate agenda and the sustainable development goals (SDGs), as they can:

• Mobilize capital from investors who are interested in environmental and social goals, as well as financial returns, and channel it to green projects that can enhance the resilience and sustainability of the economy and society.
• Diversify the sources and instruments of financing for green projects, and increase the transparency and accountability of environmental spending and impact.
• Create positive spillovers and synergies for the development of the local capital markets and the green economy, as they can foster innovation, transparency, and regulation in the financial sector, and stimulate the demand and supply of green goods and services in the real sector.

Some recommendations or suggestions for future research or action to expand and improve the green bond market are:

• Develop and harmonize the definitions, criteria, and standards for green bonds, and establish and enforce mandatory and comprehensive regulation and supervision of the green bond market, to ensure the quality and integrity of green bonds and prevent greenwashing or misrepresentation of environmental claims.
• Reduce the transaction costs and complexity of green bond issuance and verification, and provide incentives and support for green bond issuers and investors, such as tax benefits, subsidies, or guarantees, to increase the attractiveness and accessibility of green bonds.
• Increase the availability and liquidity of green bonds in the local and global markets, and provide information and guidance on the performance and impact of green bonds, such as ratings, indices, or reports, to increase the demand and liquidity of green bonds.
• Enhance the measurement and reporting of the environmental benefits and outcomes of green projects financed by green bonds, and use various methods and indicators to evaluate and compare the impact of green bonds, such as lifecycle analysis, counterfactual analysis, or project-specific metrics.
• Promote the alignment and integration of green bonds with other sustainable finance instruments and frameworks, such as social bonds, sustainability bonds, sustainability-linked bonds, or the SDGs, to create a holistic and coherent approach to financing the transition to a low-carbon and green economy.

Thanks for Reading 🙏

Connect with Author on LinkedIn 

Follow FinGlimpse on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Flipboard, WhatsApp, Telegram